“There is this misguided idea that criticism is equal to fault-finding, that when you critique, parang kakabahan na ‘yung mga tao kasi people think you’re going to have something negative to say,” art critic Pristine de Leon says in the latest episode of Rolling Stone Philippines Roundtable.
Here, de Leon, film critic Lé Baltar, and literary and music critic Itos Ledesma joined Rolling Stone Philippines for a conversation on the state of criticism in the country, across art, film, literature, and music. The roundtable discussion raises and attempts to answer questions about the financial viability of criticism as work, whether critics must cater to audiences, and what’s missing in Filipino criticism today.
“To me, [criticism] is not a passion project,” Baltar says. “‘Yun ‘yung myth na gusto kong basagin, to see criticism as cultural work, as labor.”
De Leon, a researcher and educator from Ateneo de Manila University, says that being in the academe sustains her work as a critic. “What I find nourishing and helpful about being in the academe is that, not only do I get a paycheck from there, or that I get the money to pay the rent, but having roots and being grounded in the academe, that’s where I get my ideas,” she says.
“A trend that I kind of see emerging with a lot of younger writers is they’re doing things in spite of the mainstream, which is always brilliant,” says Ledesma. “I hope that they’re able to sustain that practice.”
The latest episode of the Rolling Stone Philippines Roundtable is now available to watch on our YouTube channel.
