Advertisement
Advertisement
Again?

Do We Really Need A ‘Harry Potter’ Series?

The answer, good reader, is a resounding no

By
FacebookTwitterEmailCopy Link
Harry potter series
HBO Max’s Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone premieres this Christmas. Photo from Harry Potter/Facebook

We’re getting a series adaptation of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone — this may not necessarily be a good thing. 

The trailer for the latest addition to the franchise just dropped, and it introduces us to a new roster of actors entering the Harry Potter universe. We see a young, bright-eyed Harry (Dominic McLaughlin) survive the abusive tirades of his aunt Petunia (Bel Powley), ram his way through the wall at Platform 9 ¾, and introduce himself to an equally starry-eyed Ron (Alastair Stout) and Hermione (Arabella Stanton). He can also be spotted taking his Nimbus 2000 to the Quidditch field and receiving his very first wand from Ollivander (Anton Lesser).

If this all sounds familiar, that’s because the series is following pretty much the same beats as the film adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s widely acclaimed novel. Over the past few years, Rowling has repeatedly made headlines due to her remarks against transgender people and her vocal opinions that align with that of trans exclusionary radical feminism (or, in short, we’re calling her a TERF). Rowling herself is an executive producer on the series, drawing contention even from several of the actors on the show.

Advertisement

“She’s allowed her opinion and I’m allowed mine, they just don’t align in any way, shape or form,” actor Nick Frost, who plays Hagrid in the upcoming series, told Deadline

John Lithgow, who plays Albus Dumbledore, told The New York Times that he almost pulled out of the series due to the backlash he’d received from accepting the role. “Every interview I will ever do for the rest of my life, this will come up,” he said.

As a former Potterhead who grew up watching Rowling burn down all of her public dignity with her transphobia, I find it difficult to see the merits of revamping the novels on the small screen, especially given her direct involvement with the adaptation. Over the years, Rowling has dug her own metaphorical grave with her hateful rhetoric, bringing the Harry Potter franchise down in the dirt with her. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint have all publicly denounced the author, with very few of the original cast standing on her side (ahem, Tom Felton).

Advertisement

Moreover, considering how it looks like the series will not be straying far, if at all, from the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, I can’t see why there would be a need to revise the film and novel at all (except if this were merely a cash grab). We’ll just have to wait for this Christmas to see what the show is like in its entirety, but so far, it definitely lacks magic.

Advertisement
Latest Issue
rolling stone philippines march 2026 cover anne curtis

Rolling Stone Philippines Anniversary Issue, Now Available at SariSari Shopping

Advertisement

To provide a customized ad experience, we need to know if you are of legal age in your region.

By making a selection, you agree to our Terms & Conditions.